Re: Re: Plans for solving the VACUUM problem

From: Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Re: Plans for solving the VACUUM problem
Date: 2001-05-18 03:50:40
Message-ID: 3B049C10.E6D33548@tm.ee
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
>
> mlw <markw(at)mohawksoft(dot)com> writes:

> > Also, it would be good to be able to update the statistics without doing a
> > vacuum, i.e. rather than having to vacuum to analyze, being able to analyze
> > without a vacuum.
>
> Irrelevant, not to mention already done ...

Do you mean that we already can do just analyze ?

What is the syntax ?

----------------
Hannu

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hannu Krosing 2001-05-18 04:04:42 Re: Plans for solving the VACUUM problem
Previous Message August Zajonc 2001-05-18 03:31:54 Re: Plans for solving the VACUUM problem