| From: | Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Radius Administrator <radius(at)mail(dot)cnz(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: INT8 sequences |
| Date: | 2001-05-08 19:43:27 |
| Message-ID: | 3AF84C5F.DF5FEE29@archonet.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-sql |
Radius Administrator wrote:
>
> Is it true that PostgreSQL sequences are always INT4? If so, how
Yep
> would the following be modified to work as obviously intended?
>
> CREATE SEQUENCE tbl_id INCREMENT 1 START 1;
> CREATE TABLE tbl
> (
> id INT8 DEFAULT NEXTVAL('tbl_id') PRIMARY KEY
> );
Check the mailing list archives for lengthy discussions on int8
sequences. Once you've found it's mostly people complaining without
volunteering to do anything go over to http://techdocs.postgresql.org/
and look at Roberto Mello's plpgsql cookbook and the int8 page in my
postgresql notes - I summarised anything useful I saw about it. The
first example I give is probably fine for just generating unique id's.
- Richard Huxton
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jack | 2001-05-08 23:27:16 | transaction isolation question |
| Previous Message | Roger Wernersson | 2001-05-08 18:31:13 | Re: SQL Server -> Postgres migration: Stored Procedure replacement? |