Re: Packaging 7.1.1

From: Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>
To: Rachit Siamwalla <rachit(at)ensim(dot)com>
Cc: "'Bruce Momjian'" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Packaging 7.1.1
Date: 2001-05-04 03:28:42
Message-ID: 3AF221EA.F3F24BDD@wgcr.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Rachit Siamwalla wrote:
> Thanks a lot for your total and complete description of the process. (i
> should have checked out the sprm first before asking). I empathize with
> what you said about packaging not being a simple task, i have been through
> the agony.

Empathize is appropriate if you've been there. But, it's better than
going six months to a year for a newer RPM -- the release lag was one
ofthe two triggers that caused me to go do this -- the other was the
upgrading issue. I won't say any more about that right now --too tired.

> About putting your stuff into the postgres tree, i believe it would be a
> "good" thing other than bad to include it in pgsq. It can be put into the
> contrib directory (because it isn't part of the "core" portable stuff). This

We'll see what transpires.

> I have a more thorough email i sent earlier, i can resend it to you if you
> want.

Hmmm.. lessee... I have Bruce's reply, which includes your message in
its entirety, I think. But, just to be safe, resend directly to me, and
add the [HACKERS] part to the subject (so it will go to the correct mail
folder, otherwise I might miss it). I have a list of messages in an
'RPMS for 7.1' subfolder of my mail folder 'Postgres' that I work
through for each release.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephan Szabo 2001-05-04 03:42:57 Re: Duplicate constraint names in 7.0.3
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-05-04 03:24:29 Re: Duplicate constraint names in 7.0.3