| From: | Alessio Bragadini <alessio(at)albourne(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: A problem with pg_dump? |
| Date: | 2001-05-03 14:50:15 |
| Message-ID: | 3AF17027.A5F63D1@albourne.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> It's not much
> harder than your given example to construct cases where dumping the rows
> in OID order would be wrong too (just takes some UPDATEs).
Yes, I figured out myself quickly. :-(
> like you may have some pre-release copy of pg_dump that gets this wrong
> (the comment format in your example is not exactly like current pg_dump,
It's pg_dump from 7.0, I am trying to move my 7.0 installation to a 7.1
database, including all the structure changes that we made in our
development system. That's why I am stuck. Is it possible to use pg_dump
7.1 on a 7.0 database?
--
Alessio F. Bragadini alessio(at)albourne(dot)com
APL Financial Services http://village.albourne.com
Nicosia, Cyprus phone: +357-2-755750
"It is more complicated than you think"
-- The Eighth Networking Truth from RFC 1925
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gunnar R|nning | 2001-05-03 14:55:29 | Re: Re: The new, the improved ... FTS Searching of Mailing List Archives |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2001-05-03 14:33:43 | Re: A problem with pg_dump? |