From: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | thomas(at)pgsql(dot)com, The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, peter(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk |
Subject: | Re: v7.1.1 branched and released on Tuesday ... |
Date: | 2001-04-30 15:02:08 |
Message-ID: | 3AED7E70.80FED7E7@alumni.caltech.edu |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
> > Nothing serious, but I would like to apply a patch to allow IDENT
> > strings (e.g. 'hour') to be accepted by the SQL92 EXTRACT() function. We
> > accept those for date_part(), which is what EXTRACT() is translated to
> > by the parser, and it seems to be a reasonable to the standard.
> But why does that need to go into 7.1.1?
Does not "need to". But it is non-invasive, extremely low risk, gets the
behavior to match the docs, and gets it off my desk and into the main
tree.
- Thomas
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marcin Zukowski | 2001-04-30 15:30:04 | Found an example prooving bug |
Previous Message | pgsql-bugs | 2001-04-30 12:29:21 | Date Conversion Bug |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2001-04-30 15:22:16 | Re: Re: Any optimizations to the join code in 7.1? |
Previous Message | Jan Wieck | 2001-04-30 13:41:53 | Re: SAPDB Open Souce |