Hardcopy docs available

From: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
To: Hackers List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-announce(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Hardcopy docs available
Date: 2001-04-20 16:45:13
Message-ID: 3AE06799.4E1088C6@alumni.caltech.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-announce pgsql-docs pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

I've posted the 7.1 hardcopy (postscript) docs at

ftp://ftp.postgresql.org/pub/doc/7.1/*.ps.gz

and

http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs

I've also generated standalone html versions of the docs in case someone
wants that format. All are available at the http reference above.

I was not able to get into the site to test the ftp connection, but it
*should* work. Let me know if it does not. Also, if there is interest in
an A4 layout of the docs, let me know...

afaik things should be available on mirrors by tomorrow.

- Thomas

Can someone generate PDF versions of these? Sorry I can't remember all
those who volunteered, so perhaps we should coordinate on the -hackers
list so folks don't duplicate work. Thanks!

Responses

Browse pgsql-announce by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2001-04-20 17:16:00 Re: [HACKERS] Hardcopy docs available
Previous Message Lamar Owen 2001-04-16 16:16:57 RPMs for PostgreSQL7.1 available.

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2001-04-20 17:16:00 Re: [HACKERS] Hardcopy docs available
Previous Message Thomas Lockhart 2001-04-20 15:52:33 pgsql/doc/src/sgml Makefile biblio.sgml catalo ...

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Guilherme Fortunato 2001-04-20 16:45:46 I want to unsubscribe, how can i do it?
Previous Message dev 2001-04-20 16:35:01 Re: very slow execution of stored procedures

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Lockhart 2001-04-20 16:49:05 Docs on web site
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-04-20 16:35:46 Re: System catalog representation of access privileges