| From: | Jeff Hoffmann <jeff(at)propertykey(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: RTREE on points |
| Date: | 2001-04-17 16:11:09 |
| Message-ID: | 3ADC6B1D.5C4C2D71@propertykey.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-sql |
Tom Lane wrote:
> BTW, you should also look at the GIST stuff and figure out whether
> it might not be better to develop a GIST opclass instead of rtree.
> In the long run I suspect GIST will be better supported than rtree,
> since it's more general.
>
> regards, tom lane
are there any built-in GIST opclasses? i didn't see any when looking
through the system tables. weren't there things like gist_box_ops &
gist_poly_ops at one time? i know there are a couple of GiST examples
in contrib (seg, cube & intarray), but i thought there used to be at
least a gist_box_ops. or was that another contrib item that got
dropped?
--
Jeff Hoffmann
PropertyKey.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2001-04-17 16:35:49 | Re: RTREE on points |
| Previous Message | Brook Milligan | 2001-04-17 16:07:24 | Re: Re: Using Random Sequence as Key |