From: | Evgeny Shishkin <itparanoia(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Niels Kristian Schjødt <nielskristian(at)autouncle(dot)com>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Do I have a hardware or a software problem? |
Date: | 2012-12-12 01:44:24 |
Message-ID: | 3ADBD9A3-966F-40E8-AF78-0F2093D79BEE@gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Dec 12, 2012, at 5:29 AM, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On 12/12/2012 09:17 AM, Evgeny Shishkin wrote:
>>
>> Actually most of low-end SSDs don't do write caching, they do not have enough ram for that. Sandforce for example.
>>
> Or, worse, some of them do limited write caching but don't protect their write cache from power loss. Instant data corruption!
>
> I would be extremely reluctant to use low-end SSDs for a database server.
>
>> If we are talking about dedicated machine for database with ssd drives, why would anybody don't by hardware raid for about 500-700$?
> I'd want to consider whether the same money is better spent on faster, higher quality SSDs with their own fast write caches.
>
High quality ssd costs 5-7$ per GB. Consumer grade ssd - 1$. Highend - 11$
New intel dc s3700 2-3$ per GB as far as i remember.
So far, more than a year already, i bought consumer ssds with 300-400$ hw raid. Cost effective and fast, may be not very safe, but so far so good. All data protection measures from postgresql are on, of course.
> --
> Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
> PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Rosser Schwarz | 2012-12-12 01:47:28 | Re: Do I have a hardware or a software problem? |
Previous Message | Craig Ringer | 2012-12-12 01:29:02 | Re: Do I have a hardware or a software problem? |