Re: No printable 7.1 docs?

From: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
To: Vince Vielhaber <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com>, Christopher Masto <chris+pg-general(at)netmonger(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: No printable 7.1 docs?
Date: 2001-04-17 00:07:26
Message-ID: 3ADB893E.CEC4DD0D@alumni.caltech.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> They're not ready yet.

Since they were deemed non-essential for this release, and since the
release schedule is not built around their creation, I no longer feel
obligated to have them finished on the release date. A nice change from
the deadlines I've been working on for the last three years or so :)

This is the first release with the "no hardcopy" policy, and user
feedback is certainly desirable and appreciated.

I hope to be able to find time to finish them soon; a couple are
essentially done already, but the Reference Manual will be problematic
as usual (the jade RTF output is not handled by M$Word, and exhibits the
same symptoms as when read by Applixware).

- Thomas

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2001-04-17 02:16:41 RE: Truncation of object names
Previous Message Vince Vielhaber 2001-04-16 20:52:45 Re: No printable 7.1 docs?