From: | Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: RPM upgrade caveats going from a beta version to RC |
Date: | 2001-04-11 20:30:02 |
Message-ID: | 3AD4BECA.6242DFE6@wgcr.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>
> Lamar Owen writes:
>
> > One quick note -- since 'R' < 'b', the RC RPM's must be forced to
> > install with --oldpackage, as RPM does a simple strcmp of version
> > numbers -- 7.1RC3 < 7.1beta1, for instance. Just force it with
> > --oldpackage if you have a 7.1beta RPM already installed.
>
> Btw., are you aware of the 'serial' tag to override the version guessing
> mechanism?
Yes, I am, actually. But it seems a broken way of dealing with it.
Although I do have another idea, thanks to Trond. Rather than package
'7.1RC4-1' I could package '7.1-0.1RC4' -- giving a straight
versioning. I could progress from '7.1-0.1beta1.1' through
'7.1-0.1beta6.2' through '7.1-0.2RC1.1' to '7.1-1'.
Last time I looked at the documentation for the serial tag, its use was
strongly discouraged. But that _has_ been awhile -- maybe it could be
useful. But I would prefer the whole version numbering thingtobe fixed,
as the Debian packages have the same issue -- and I don't know if .deb
has an analog to Serial:.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kyle VanderBeek | 2001-04-11 20:46:44 | Re: Re: Large Object problems (was Re: JDBC int8 hack) |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2001-04-11 18:25:41 | Re: AW: AW: Truncation of char, varchar types |