From: | Justin Clift <jclift(at)iprimus(dot)com(dot)au> |
---|---|
To: | The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
Cc: | Richard Boyes <r(dot)boyes(at)auckland(dot)ac(dot)nz>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: linux/bsd |
Date: | 2001-04-09 17:07:01 |
Message-ID: | 3AD1EC35.65309F2C@iprimus.com.au |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Hi Marc,
No argument there. Solaris 8 is a LOT better then previous versions in
regards to driver support, but still a long way behind *BSD, linux,
Windows, etc.
BUT, if you've got hardware it DOES work on... it's really nice.
Regards and best wishes,
Justin Clift
The Hermit Hacker wrote:
>
> On Mon, 9 Apr 2001, Justin Clift wrote:
>
> > Hi Richard,
> >
> > Solaris 8 INTEL is very stable and free for commercial use :
> > http://www.sun.com/solaris/
> >
> > You can download it directly from the web too (full version, no timeouts
> > or anything holding back):
> > http://www.sun.com/software/solaris/binaries/download.html
> >
> > It's kind of picky about which hardware it will work on though. There
> > is a list at :
> > http://soldc.sun.com/support/drivers/hcl/8/101/BOOK.htm
> >
> > If you have hardware it likes, I'd go with Solaris INTEL, otherwise one
> > of the BSD crowd (known for stability) or Linux.
>
> Based on my personal experiences (University I work at is predominantly
> Solaris based for Unix .. .slowly shifting *muhahaha*) ... Solaris INTEL
> is one of the worst OSs I've had the misfortune to deal with :( Ppl
> complain about how the BSD OSs don't support as much hardware as Linux,
> but Solaris takes the cake in that department ... you have to go to
> Adaptec's web site to get drives if you want to use a U160 SCSI
> controller, as *it* isn't supported :(
>
> >
> > Regards and best wishes,
> >
> > Justin Clift
> >
> > Richard Boyes wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello all,
> > >
> > > I'm in the process of making some decisions as to
> > > what OS I should be using for a product that development
> > > will begin on soon. It's a web based thing using postgres,
> > > apache etc and will be all on one machine.
> > >
> > > My question is to what operating system would be a better
> > > one to use for postgres. ie linux/bsd.
> > >
> > > I know postgres works fine on both but some opinion
> > > from the postgres developer community as to which OS
> > > they prefer would have a bearing on this decision.
> > >
> > > PS sorry in advance for posting a question that might
> > > spark a lot of opinions.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > Richard.
> > >
> > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> > > TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
> > > (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> >
> > --
> > "My grandfather once told me that there are two kinds of people: those
> > who work and those who take the credit. He told me to try to be in the
> > first group; there was less competition there."
> > - Indira Gandhi
> >
> > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> > TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
> > (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> >
>
> Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy
> Systems Administrator @ hub.org
> primary: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org secondary: scrappy(at){freebsd|postgresql}.org
--
"My grandfather once told me that there are two kinds of people: those
who work and those who take the credit. He told me to try to be in the
first group; there was less competition there."
- Indira Gandhi
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joel Burton | 2001-04-09 17:28:33 | Re: store procedure |
Previous Message | Pupík Jan | 2001-04-09 17:03:27 | table level locking vs. row level (or whatever PSQL uses) |