Re: Re: RC3 ... and rpms...

From: Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>
To: Karl DeBisschop <karl(at)debisschop(dot)net>
Cc: Franck Martin <franck(at)sopac(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Re: RC3 ... and rpms...
Date: 2001-04-07 14:03:39
Message-ID: 3ACF1E3B.1CE059CE@wgcr.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Karl DeBisschop wrote:
> In my experience so far, it is also noticably slower than gzip. It does
> work, and it is available. I have not yet been convinced that the space
> savings is worth the time lost. But ISTM this is a minor point.

The official tarball is gzipped -- the RPM will use that until bzipped
tarballs are official.

> Actually, since you can suppress installation of the docs with --nodocs,
> I would very much prefer to keep the html and text docs in the main RPM.
> Otherwise I have two directories in /usr/doc for one software suite.

The html docs at the very least will remain in the main package.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message The Hermit Hacker 2001-04-07 14:11:17 Re: Re: RC3 ...
Previous Message Lamar Owen 2001-04-07 13:56:04 Re: Re: RC3 ...