Re: Re: RC3 ...

From: Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>
To: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
Cc: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Vince Vielhaber <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Re: RC3 ...
Date: 2001-04-07 12:04:30
Message-ID: 3ACF024E.97C97977@wgcr.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Thomas Lockhart wrote:
>
> > > OTOH, if Marc was only thinking of removing the pre-built docs from the
> > > tarball, I don't object to that. I'm not sure why those weren't
> > > distributed as separate tarballs from the get-go. I just say that the
> > > doc sources are part of the source distribution...
>
> >From the get-go, the docs were not, uh, useful docs. They have grown
> quite a bit from 1996 (with sources and formatting, probably by orders
> of magnitude).

Today's docs make even the docs of version 6.1.1 look pretty puny.

I'm looking at the package reorganization for the RPM's this morning --
we'll see what I find in a few hours.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11

In response to

  • Re: RC3 ... at 2001-04-06 23:49:59 from Thomas Lockhart

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Lamar Owen 2001-04-07 12:09:55 Re: Re: RC3 ...
Previous Message Lamar Owen 2001-04-07 11:59:39 Re: Re: RC3 ... and rpms...