From: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> |
---|---|
To: | "Henry B(dot) Hotz" <hotz(at)jpl(dot)nasa(dot)gov> |
Cc: | lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org, Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>, tih(at)kpnQwest(dot)no, scrappy(at)hub(dot)org, Hackers List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, ask(at)wisdom(dot)weizmann(dot)ac(dot)il, thomas(at)pgsql(dot)com |
Subject: | Re: MacOS X OK, was: Call for platforms |
Date: | 2001-03-31 00:57:04 |
Message-ID: | 3AC52B60.AF776D97@alumni.caltech.edu |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> Well, once I figured out a few things about how to use the Unix part
> of MacOS X it seemed to work without a hitch in the regression
> testing. I need to figure out how to make the system start it up
> automatically at boot time still, but then I need to figure out how
> to do double sided printing on an HP 5si and several other things too.
OK, that confirms that MacOS X is supported.
> BTW the offer of testing on NetBSD/mac68k stands. 250MB is plenty if
> you don't use X, and I have some extra disks anyway. I'll probably
> try NetBSD/macppc sometime in the next week or so.
I'm always tempted to snare another platform "win", but will draw the
line at dragging my own machines out of the closet ;) If there is no
potential user who cares about it, we should let it die a graceful
death.
For NetBSD/ppc (and any other platform not on the list) the sooner the
better; if you can bang it out at the beginning of the week we should be
able to get the info into the release.
- Thomas
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mathijs Brands | 2001-03-31 01:05:12 | Re: Third call for platform testing (linux 2.4.x) |
Previous Message | Jim Mercer | 2001-03-31 00:51:12 | pg_hba.conf "password" authentication broken? |