From: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> |
---|---|
To: | Adriaan Joubert <a(dot)joubert(at)albourne(dot)com> |
Cc: | Postgresql <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Unsigned int functions |
Date: | 2001-03-30 06:17:31 |
Message-ID: | 3AC424FB.33264C61@alumni.caltech.edu |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> If general opinion is that unsigned types should not be part of
> postgres, I'll have to look at turning them into a contrib type. Please
> let me know.
Providing them as a contrib/ package will allow you to provide the
*full* complement of cross-type conversion and operator functions
without worrying about bloat. Tom Lane has shown how to use entry points
on shared libraries to start us thinking about how to provide better
package integration, which should allow us to reduce the distinction
between contrib/ and standard features.
This would be a great package to develop these additional package
support features for 7.2 (hint hint ;)
- Thomas
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thomas Lockhart | 2001-03-30 06:22:21 | Re: [PATCHES] Error in the date field (with NULL value...).Thanks! |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2001-03-30 06:15:15 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: possible row locking bug in 7.0.3 & 7.1 |