From: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org, Hackers List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, thomas(at)pgsql(dot)com |
Subject: | Re: Re: Call for platforms |
Date: | 2001-03-26 20:43:11 |
Message-ID: | 3ABFA9DF.F2693503@alumni.caltech.edu |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
> > > > SCO OpenServer 5 x86 7.1 2001-03-13, Billy Allie
> > > Where did you see this? I don't find it in the archives or in Vince's
> > > database.
> > In FAQ_SCO. I was looking to try to figure out what the differences were
> > between the SCO products :)
> I wouldn't necessarily count something dated Oct 9, 2000. That was half a
> year ago, and even two months before beta. And the message doesn't
> actually say it worked.
?? I can see I was thrown off by the "last updated:" line near the top
of the file. It actually comes from a CVS commit, not from an explicit
update of the info in the file.
Very bad :(
- Thomas
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Doug McNaught | 2001-03-26 20:49:32 | Re: Starting Postmaster |
Previous Message | Thomas Lockhart | 2001-03-26 20:39:10 | Re: Re: Call for platforms |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Matthias Juchem | 2001-03-26 21:39:16 | CVS tags for betas and release candidate |
Previous Message | Thomas Lockhart | 2001-03-26 20:39:10 | Re: Re: Call for platforms |