From: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org, Hackers List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Re: Call for platforms |
Date: | 2001-03-26 20:36:19 |
Message-ID: | 3ABFA843.42118104@alumni.caltech.edu |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
> "PPC750"? What's that? "PPC G3" might be more likely to mean something
> to onlookers ...
Actually "G3" means nothing outside of Apple afaict. The 750 series is a
follow-on to the 60x series, and there is a 7xxx series also. From my
pov, using an accepted label, rather than a marketing (re)label, better
indicates *what* this actually can run on. I'm not sure that I have it
labeled correctly yet, but "G3" is not a step in the right direction.
As we both found, it is difficult to wade through Apple's own docs to
decipher which processor is actually built into the system.
Should I put "Mac G3" in the comment section?
- Thomas
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thomas Lockhart | 2001-03-26 20:39:10 | Re: Re: Call for platforms |
Previous Message | Scott Gritton | 2001-03-26 20:21:55 | Starting Postmaster |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thomas Lockhart | 2001-03-26 20:39:10 | Re: Re: Call for platforms |
Previous Message | Adriaan Joubert | 2001-03-26 19:30:32 | Unsigned ints |