| From: | Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alfred Perlstein <bright(at)wintelcom(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev(at)SECTORBASE(dot)COM>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Allowing WAL fsync to be done via O_SYNC |
| Date: | 2001-03-15 19:37:03 |
| Message-ID: | 3AB119DF.DBCF003D@wgcr.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> * Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> [010315 11:07] wrote:
> > Peter, what do you think about configuration-dependent defaults for
> > GUC variables?
> Sorry, what's a GUC? :)
Grand Unified Configuration, Peter E.'s baby.
See the thread starting at
http://www.postgresql.org/mhonarc/pgsql-hackers/2000-03/msg00107.html
for details.
(And the search is working.... :-)).
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alfred Perlstein | 2001-03-15 19:40:14 | Re: Allowing WAL fsync to be done via O_SYNC |
| Previous Message | Alfred Perlstein | 2001-03-15 19:17:24 | Re: Allowing WAL fsync to be done via O_SYNC |