| From: | Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev(at)SECTORBASE(dot)COM>, "'Bruce Momjian'" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA(at)wien(dot)spardat(dot)at>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: AW: Proposed WAL changes |
| Date: | 2001-03-07 23:14:14 |
| Message-ID: | 3AA6C0C6.52CCE461@tpf.co.jp |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
>
> "Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev(at)SECTORBASE(dot)COM> writes:
> > So, it's better to leave archdir in pg_control now - if we'll
> > decide that GUC is better place then we'll just ignore archdir
> > in pg_control. But if it will be better to have it in pg_control
> > then we'll not be able to add it there.
>
> But what possible reason is there for keeping it in pg_control?
> AFAICS that would just mean that we'd need special code for setting it,
> instead of making use of all of Peter's hard work on GUC.
>
I don't think it's appropriate to edit archdir by hand.
Regards,
Hiroshi Inoue
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Oliver Elphick | 2001-03-07 23:21:56 | Re: pg_dump writes SEQUENCEs twice with -a |
| Previous Message | Philip Warner | 2001-03-07 23:10:04 | Re: pg_dump writes SEQUENCEs twice with -a |