From: | will trillich <will(at)serensoft(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | mweilguni(at)sime(dot)com |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: pg_dumpall -> fails SOLVED |
Date: | 2001-03-01 21:26:03 |
Message-ID: | 3A9EBE68.6917EAD7@serensoft.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Mario Weilguni wrote:
>
> Am Mittwoch, 28. Februar 2001 10:43 schrieb will trillich:
> > so i've got my data recovered (thanks to oliver) and now
> > i wanna back it up with a pg_dumpall...
> >
> > instead, i get 'failed sanity check, type with oid 779927 was no
> > found' in the oddest places...
>
> I'm just guessing, but it is possible that you're using different versions of
> pg_dump and postmaster? I had a similar problem when I had an old 7.0 binary
> lying around in /usr/bin/ when trying to dump a 7.1 database.
no, it was that i'd been iterating through a series of
drop table xyz;
create table xyz ( ... );
drop function pdq ( xyz );
create function pdq ( xyz ) returns .... ;
when it reached the "drop function" it was referenceing an old
instance (oid) of the xyz table. then a new function was created
that referred to the new table (oid). i found six such functions
referring to nonexistent tables.
apparently postgresql does cascading correctly on rules, indexes,
and triggers when deleting tables that they depend on. but a function
argument that's defined in terms of a table -- apparently that slipped
through the cracks!
i.e.
create table eg( id int4 );
create index ed_id_idx on eg ( id );
create function go( eg ) .... ;
drop table eg; -- this also drops the index, but not the function
so, instead, now i
drop function pdq ( xyz );
drop table xyz;
create table xyz ( ... );
create function pdq ( xyz ) returns .... ;
dropping the function first, works like a charm.
--
mailto:will(at)serensoft(dot)com
http://www.dontUthink.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | GH | 2001-03-01 22:02:32 | Re: database diff |
Previous Message | Brent R. Matzelle | 2001-03-01 21:24:05 | Re: has anybody gotten cygwin1.1.8 to work with postgresql? |