| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | sqllist <pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Weird NOT IN effect with NULL values |
| Date: | 2001-03-01 18:32:07 |
| Message-ID: | 3A9E95A7.63FE080D@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-sql |
Mr. Joerdens,
> I get no rows if the result column returned by the subselect
> contains NULL values. It works as expected if I remove the NULL values
> from the result set. Is this behaviour correct and if so, why?
I can see how that bug would happen. You may want to forward your
e-mail to pgsql-bugs.
Regardless, you'll find that you get faster results (as well as avoiding
the NULL bug) if you use the following form of the query:
SELECT name
FROM customer
WHERE NOT EXISTS (
SELECT customer_id
FROM salesorder
WHERE customer_id = customer.customer_id
);
Bruce, you may want to consider editing your next edition to include the
above modification. WHERE ... NOT IN is a bad idea for any subselect on
medium-large tables.
-Josh Berkus
--
______AGLIO DATABASE SOLUTIONS___________________________
Josh Berkus
Complete information technology josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com
and data management solutions (415) 565-7293
for law firms, small businesses fax 621-2533
and non-profit organizations. San Francisco
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ken Kline | 2001-03-01 18:32:52 | Re: Weird NOT IN effect with NULL values |
| Previous Message | Frank Joerdens | 2001-03-01 18:16:54 | Weird NOT IN effect with NULL values |