Re: Improving connection scalability (src/backend/storage/ipc/procarray.c)

From: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
To: Ranier Vilela <ranier(dot)vf(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Improving connection scalability (src/backend/storage/ipc/procarray.c)
Date: 2022-05-28 15:17:46
Message-ID: 3A9C8E3D-DE5D-4374-A3A0-5AC1F43260BD@yesql.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On 28 May 2022, at 16:12, Ranier Vilela <ranier(dot)vf(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> Just because I don't have enough hardware to force GetSnapShotData() doesn't mean optimizing it won't make a difference.

Quoting Andres from upthread:

"To improve something like GetSnapshotData() you first have to come up with
a workload that shows it being a meaningful part of a profile. Unless it
is, performance differences are going to just be due to various forms of
noise."

If you think this is a worthwhile improvement, you need to figure out a way to
reliably test it in order to prove it.

--
Daniel Gustafsson https://vmware.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Gustafsson 2022-05-28 15:26:05 Re: [PATCH] Support % wildcard in extension upgrade filenames
Previous Message Daniel Gustafsson 2022-05-28 15:11:59 Re: postgres and initdb not working inside docker