From: | Joseph Shraibman <jks(at)selectacast(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | Ingo Luetkebohle <ingo(at)blank(dot)pages(dot)de>, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Concurrency supported? |
Date: | 2001-02-27 00:44:22 |
Message-ID: | 3A9AF866.436C35E0@selectacast.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>
> Ingo Luetkebohle writes:
>
> > how good is concurrency supported in the JDBC driver? For example, if
> > I have a small process with about 50 threads, some of them requesting
> > large objects, will one JDBC connection suffice? If one thread is
> > executing a large select which takes seconds to execute, will other
> > threads be able to still get their results in time or do they have to
> > wait?
> >
> > In general, are there concurrency limitations in the protocol
> > PostgreSQL uses?
>
> See http://www.postgresql.org/devel-corner/docs/postgres/jdbc-thread.html
>
Someone might want to add that different threads can't use the same
connection if they are using transaction blocks.
--
Joseph Shraibman
jks(at)selectacast(dot)net
Increase signal to noise ratio. http://www.targabot.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Qiqi Dong | 2001-02-27 01:28:41 | Support for callable statement |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-02-26 22:50:42 | Re: The patch I sent a day ago. |