| From: | Joseph Shraibman <jks(at)selectacast(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Ingo Luetkebohle <ingo(at)blank(dot)pages(dot)de>, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Concurrency supported? |
| Date: | 2001-02-27 00:44:22 |
| Message-ID: | 3A9AF866.436C35E0@selectacast.net |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>
> Ingo Luetkebohle writes:
>
> > how good is concurrency supported in the JDBC driver? For example, if
> > I have a small process with about 50 threads, some of them requesting
> > large objects, will one JDBC connection suffice? If one thread is
> > executing a large select which takes seconds to execute, will other
> > threads be able to still get their results in time or do they have to
> > wait?
> >
> > In general, are there concurrency limitations in the protocol
> > PostgreSQL uses?
>
> See http://www.postgresql.org/devel-corner/docs/postgres/jdbc-thread.html
>
Someone might want to add that different threads can't use the same
connection if they are using transaction blocks.
--
Joseph Shraibman
jks(at)selectacast(dot)net
Increase signal to noise ratio. http://www.targabot.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Qiqi Dong | 2001-02-27 01:28:41 | Support for callable statement |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-02-26 22:50:42 | Re: The patch I sent a day ago. |