Re: floating point representationu

From: Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: floating point representationu
Date: 2001-02-20 04:27:56
Message-ID: 3A91F24C.88BA8B2E@tpf.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > > > >From the first I don't want to change the current default
> > > > output format
> > > > "%." #FLT_DIG "g" (REAL)
> > > > "%." #DBL_DIG "g" (DOUBLE PRECISION)
> > > > for 7.1 because their changes would cause a regress
> > > > test failure.
> > >
> > > But we run regress with the proper setting, right?> How does giving
> > > people the ability to change the defaults affect the regression tests?
> > >
> >
> > Hmm I'm afraid I'm misunderstanding your point.
> > If the default float4(8) output format would be the
> > same as current output format then we would have no
> > problem with the current regress test. But there
> > could be a choise to change default output format
> > to have a large enough presision to distinguish
> > float4(8).
>
> But are they going to change the default to run the regression tests?
> How do they change it? in ~/.psqlrc?
>

Probably there's a misunderstanding between you and I
but unfortunaltely I don't understand what it is in my
poor English.
Anyway in my plan(current format as default) there would
be no problem with regress test at least for 7.1.

Regards,
Hiroshi Inoue

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2001-02-20 04:28:27 Re: floating point representationu
Previous Message Thomas Lockhart 2001-02-20 04:19:10 Re: floating point representation