From: | Emmanuel Charpentier <charpent(at)bacbuc(dot)dyndns(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Questions to lists / translations |
Date: | 2001-02-17 09:12:27 |
Message-ID: | 3A8E407B.E457203C@bacbuc.dyndns.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-general |
Christopher Sawtell wrote:
>
[ ... High number iof questions to the list, although of good level ...
]
> This is a universal problem. It is that once a particular package reaches
> that critical mass it is completely impossible for a small team of
> developers to both help the user community _and_ to develop anything at
> all. I've seen this in both the free and the comercial software worlds.
>
> The commercial world tries to solve it by having "Knowledge Base"
> machinery of some kind or another. My own exp. is that it simply does not
> work.
A good "knowledge base" for PostgreSQL was the mailing list archive.
However, it started having serious problems abck in november, and I
haven't checked it since.
> It might help to install ht://dig so that the online documentation can be
> searched easily. If people think that that would be a good idea then I'd
> be happy to make that contribution.
This engine could also usefully be aimed at the mailing lists archive !
However, a *very* useful feature would be a "human made" indexing. Quite
a load of work ...
It might also be useful to have on the lists people with a good
knowledge of PostgreSQL (at least recent versions) dedicated to
answering these questions. This would ease the load on developpers
proprio dictu.
This way, you would have a kind of a three-tiered help system :
- Search engine on the docs, the FAQs and the lists archive ;
- "Answer" volunteers for hard-but-answerable-from-the-specs questions
;
- Developpers for questions requiring a good knowledge of PostgreSQL
internals.
> Another point is that PostgreSQL is widely used by people who have learnt
> English at school. English is a proper horror of a language & it must be
> extremely difficult to understand the docs. if you didn't learn English on
> your Mother's knee. I learnt French at school, but I would really _hate_
> to have to understand PostgreSQL from French docs. I'm suggesting that now
> that the critical mass of users is nearly upon us that a serious
> translation effort be made. Unfortunately I am not sufficiently able in
> any foreign language to help with translation, but could perhaps attempt
> to make the language of the documentation somewhat easier to understand.
Agreed. But keep in mind that a tralnslation is a *huge* work,
especially in a domain such as computers where most competent people are
used to more-or-less "think in English" about their domain of expertise.
Furthermore, PostgreSQL docs are a hell of a moving target ...
Therefore, such a project needs a *lot* of coordination.
Any thoughs ?
Emmanuel Charpentier
--
Emmanuel Charpentier charpent(at)bacbuc(dot)dyndns(dot)org
charpent(at)bacbuc(dot)fdn(dot)fr
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2001-02-17 14:30:30 | Re: Annotatable on-line documentation |
Previous Message | Paul M Foster | 2001-02-17 07:41:38 | Re: Re: PostgreSQL vs Oracle vs DB2 vs MySQL - Which should I use? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | MMM | 2001-02-17 09:32:23 | Foreign keys |
Previous Message | Paul M Foster | 2001-02-17 07:41:38 | Re: Re: PostgreSQL vs Oracle vs DB2 vs MySQL - Which should I use? |