| From: | Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Karel Zak <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz>, Oliver Elphick <olly(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Include files for SPI are not installed |
| Date: | 2001-02-07 20:23:31 |
| Message-ID: | 3A81AEC3.8A4616CA@wgcr.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> client-devel and server-devel are the right division IMHO. SPI is a
> subset of server-side development, but not all server-side code needs
> SPI. Consider user-written functions and datatypes. These guys do not
Ok, I can do that. Obsoletes:devel here we come!
> My thought was that we'd remove spi.h from the minimal install, along
> with anything else that's not useful for client-side programming. Thus
> the standard install footprint would get smaller. I haven't looked to
> see exactly what the list of client-side headers should be, but if
> people like this idea I will do the legwork to make the list.
Count me as liking it.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Constantin Teodorescu | 2001-02-07 20:53:25 | Re: [INTERFACES] pgAccess fails to launch on HPUX |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2001-02-07 19:50:04 | Re: pgAccess fails to launch on HPUX |