From: | Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Re: new type proposal |
Date: | 2001-02-07 08:24:31 |
Message-ID: | 3A81063E.1C8917E0@archonet.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
"Martin A. Marques" wrote:
>
> El Mar 06 Feb 2001 19:26, Sam Snow escribió:
> > OK... if this is the case, would a situation like this be a good example to
> > have on the PG website in a generic form? Then, those of us who are just
> > learning SQL and Postgresql can know how to do this correctly.
> >
> > When I was playing with PHP, I always appreciated how their documentation
> > had the ability for people to add examples and comments to the
> > documentation. I often learned more from these than the real docs.
>
> Totally with you on this one!!!! :-)
> I think THAT would be of great help, especially for SQL newbies.
Maybe what we need is some sort of module system for these things so you
could do something like:
USE MODULE auto_timestamp ON foo (last_modified)
which could apply the rules/triggers to the relevant table/column. Two
big pluses I can think of:
1. It lets lots of non-developers contribute (e.g. me) without hacking C.
2. You are using standard language features so you can learn from
modules or cut and paste if you loathe them.
I don't know how complex module support would be, but CPAN doesn't seem
to have done perl any harm.
- Richard Huxton
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter T Mount | 2001-02-07 08:35:45 | Re: [JDBC][INTERFACES][NOVICE] Postgresql inteface to Star Office using JDBC |
Previous Message | Tim Uckun | 2001-02-07 08:21:48 | Re: new type proposal |