From: | Alvar Freude <alvar(dot)freude(at)merz-akademie(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: is PG able to handle a >500 GB Database? |
Date: | 2001-01-19 03:00:24 |
Message-ID: | 3A67ADC8.E673F259@merz-akademie.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Hi,
Tom Lane schrieb:
>
> You'd probably find the OID counter wrapping around before too long.
> However, as long as you don't assume that OIDs are unique in your data
> tables, that shouldn't bother you a whole lot. AFAIK you should be
> able to make it work.
ok -- the OID-Counter is (still) 4-byte int?
As far as I guess now I don't think I need an unique OID -- if Postgres
didn't need it!
I only need two unique string fields in one table, so it might be a good
test if Postgres will be slower with lots of data ... ;-)
Ciao
Alvar
--
Alvar C.H. Freude | alvar(dot)freude(at)merz-akademie(dot)de
Demo: http://www.online-demonstration.org/ | Mach mit!
Blast-DE: http://www.assoziations-blaster.de/ | Blast-Dich-Fit
Blast-EN: http://www.a-blast.org/ | Blast/english
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2001-01-19 03:27:18 | Re: is PG able to handle a >500 GB Database? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2001-01-19 02:49:59 | Re: is PG able to handle a >500 GB Database? |