Re: MySQL file system

From: Karl DeBisschop <karl(at)debisschop(dot)net>
To:
Cc: PostgreSQL General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: MySQL file system
Date: 2001-01-17 04:30:31
Message-ID: 3A651FE7.77B64A0B@debisschop.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > > So what is needed it to be able to mount a .zip or a .tar file as a file
> > > system with the loopback device. Mounting a database on the filesystem
> > > sounds pretty useless to me.

Which can be done with cramfs on Linux. Still could be a cute trick with PostgreSQL that could be somewhat handy from time to time.

<snip>

> > I'm sure there's a few points that I missed but there are some
> > advantages, Oracle does or did have a "raw disk" mode.
> >
>
> I think the conclusion we came up to in the past is that raw database
> access was important in the 80's with older file systems, but modern
> ones don't need raw access, and most database vendors are moving away
> from recommanding raw access.

I think this was a different sense of 'raw access' - it meant 'allow the user to see a database as if it were a filesystem' if I read the post correctly. Not the same issue, I think.

--
Karl DeBisschop kdebisschop(at)alert(dot)infoplease(dot)com
Learning Network/Information Please http://www.infoplease.com
Netsaint Plugin Developer kdebisschop(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message hafiz 2001-01-17 04:33:25 postgresql.conf ignored
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-01-17 04:28:28 Re: pg_hba.conf edit