Re: MS Access vs IS NULL (was Re: [BUGS] Bug in SQL functions that use a NULL parameter directly)

From: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone23(dot)bigpanda(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: MS Access vs IS NULL (was Re: [BUGS] Bug in SQL functions that use a NULL parameter directly)
Date: 2001-01-16 04:54:25
Message-ID: 3A63D401.2B1A9348@alumni.caltech.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Anyone recall anything about that? A quick search of my archives didn't
> turn up the discussion that I thought I remembered.

Hmm. Maybe now we know what you dream about at night ;)

- Thomas

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Lark 2001-01-16 07:22:26 Does PostgreSQL support Dynamic SQL?
Previous Message Hiroshi Inoue 2001-01-16 03:13:25 Re: Why is LockClassinfoForUpdate()'s mark4update a good idea?