Re: RPMS for 7.1beta3 being uploaded.

From: Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>
To: Trond Eivind Glomsrød <teg(at)redhat(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: RPMS for 7.1beta3 being uploaded.
Date: 2001-01-15 22:32:26
Message-ID: 3A637A7A.98494993@wgcr.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Trond Eivind Glomsrød wrote:
> Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org> writes:
> > In particular, this was and is a RedHat-made change. It does not break
> > anything that I am aware of, and allows the distributions to do their
> > thing as well.

> Note that this wasn't included in Red Hat Linux 7... it's been done
> since then, and I don't remember doing it myself (which of course
> doesn't mean I didn't do it :) - it might have been done for the S/390
> port, by the people working on that.

A non-conditional version (the conditional is my change) was included as
far back as RedHat 6.2.

> For most apps, it's just a question of configure working vs. configure
> failing on IA64 (there is no "tuning" as such, my choice of words
> wasn't too good). There may be something similar for S/390.

Can we test both ways (after your current project is done)?
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-01-15 22:48:30 Why is LockClassinfoForUpdate()'s mark4update a good idea?
Previous Message Trond Eivind =?iso-8859-1?q?Glomsr=F8d?= 2001-01-15 22:25:50 Re: RPMS for 7.1beta3 being uploaded.