| From: | Joseph Shraibman <jks(at)selectacast(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | excalibur(at)hub(dot)org |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Java Classes |
| Date: | 2001-01-12 04:01:31 |
| Message-ID: | 3A5E819B.F4F2DB31@selectacast.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
excalibur(at)hub(dot)org wrote:
>
> Can PostgreSQL 7.1 store java classes or objects?
Sure it can, but not automatically. just serialize your object to a
byte array and store that String.
--
Joseph Shraibman
jks(at)selectacast(dot)net
Increase signal to noise ratio. http://www.targabot.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | drevil | 2001-01-12 04:15:20 | Re: Found a bug in the procedural languages code relating to LIMIT 1 |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2001-01-12 02:55:58 | CRCs (was Re: [GENERAL] Re: Loading optimization) |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2001-01-12 04:08:14 | Re: Pg7.1beta3: FATAL: s_lock(0x401f7010) at spin.c:147, stuck spinlock. |
| Previous Message | Valter Mazzola | 2001-01-12 03:54:55 | Pg7.1beta3: FATAL: s_lock(0x401f7010) at spin.c:147, stuck spinlock. |