From: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org, Mitchell Brandsma <mitchell(at)pienetworks(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Re: Interval bug |
Date: | 2001-01-12 02:57:32 |
Message-ID: | 3A5E729C.AB229740@alumni.caltech.edu |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
> ... Should we print the "days" +/-
> sign only when it is not the same as the "year" sign? Seems like the
> way to go.
It isn't quite that easy, but you have the right idea. My new code omits
signs unless there is a negative field value, then all subsequent fields
are signed.
That seems to be less ambiguous. fwiw, the traditional "Postgres format"
never was right in this regard (though internal calculations were done
correctly).
- Thomas
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-01-12 05:16:33 | Re: JDBC PreparedStatement.setMaxRows() affects other objects intantiated from this class and it's parent class |
Previous Message | pgsql-bugs | 2001-01-12 00:33:42 | Query Problem!! |