From: | Justin Clift <aa2(at)bigpond(dot)net(dot)au> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Possible bug? WAS :Bad (null) varchar() external representation. |
Date: | 2001-01-12 02:27:39 |
Message-ID: | 3A5E6B9B.2E45D429@bigpond.net.au |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-sql |
Hi Tom,
I think you are right. It does seem to barf on NULLS and
length(varchar), regardless.
Thanks for your assistance.
BTW - How do things normally get added to the FAQ? I would like to add
something about length(varchar) and NULLS not working in PostgreSQL
7.0.x
Regards and best wishes,
Justin Clift
Database Administrator
Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Justin Clift <aa2(at)bigpond(dot)net(dot)au> writes:
> > I haven't seen a mention of a maximum number of constraints of similar
> > applying to a table. If so, then could someone please point me to it...
>
> There is no such limit that I know of.
>
> > Yet if I remove BOTH the "staff_details_phone_three" &
> > "staff_details_managers_notes" constraints it works :
>
> Are you absolutely certain that that's how it went? I think the most
> likely story is just that you were hitting the length(varchar)-barfs-
> on-NULL bug, and got confused about which combinations you'd tried.
>
> regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2001-01-12 02:50:04 | Re: Possible bug? WAS :Bad (null) varchar() external representation. |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2001-01-12 00:36:18 | Re: "SELECT" problem on 7.0.3 |