| From: | Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Isn't init_irels() dangerous ? |
| Date: | 2001-01-06 00:58:28 |
| Message-ID: | 3A566DB4.64C0F8F2@tpf.co.jp |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> OK. Second proposal: do the init_irels() call in
> >> RelationCacheInitializePhase2(). I've just looked through the
> >> other stuff that's done in between, and I don't think any of it
> >> needs valid relcache entries.
>
> > Oops, I neglected to reply "agreed", sorry.
> > It would be much safer for init_irels() to be called
> > in a proper transaction than the current implementation.
>
> Fine. Were you going to do it, or do you want me to?
>
It would only need to change a few lines.
OK, I will do it.
Regards.
Hiroshi Inoue
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alex Pilosov | 2001-01-06 01:38:30 | Re: SHM ids (was running pgsql 7 under Jail'ed virtual machine on FreeBSD 4.2) |
| Previous Message | Ross J. Reedstrom | 2001-01-06 00:48:10 | Re: bootstrap tables |