From: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Paul Govereau <pgoverea(at)akamai(dot)com>, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Re: Inheritance docs error. |
Date: | 2001-01-02 07:11:52 |
Message-ID: | 3A517F38.8CE020E0@alumni.caltech.edu |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers |
> I am strongly inclined to rip out the pseudo-UNDER clause and support
> only the old-style INHERITS syntax for 7.1. UNDER is adding no
> functionality and I think we will eventually regret using an SQL keyword
> for non-SQL semantics.
I agree with you, Hannu, et al. If it isn't making a good effort in
truely supporting SQL9x, then it isn't yet worth having in the parser.
- Thomas
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2001-01-02 17:48:56 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: Inheritance docs error. |
Previous Message | Robert B. Easter | 2001-01-02 06:59:55 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: Inheritance docs error. |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-01-02 07:16:53 | Re: [INTERFACES] Re: PHP and PostgreSQL |
Previous Message | Robert B. Easter | 2001-01-02 06:59:55 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: Inheritance docs error. |