Re: Anyone testing changes to libpq/bcc32.mak?

I don't know that anybody does. We usually get a report a couple of
minor versions in and fix it then, which backs that guess. It's also
not tested by the buildfarm. So I think you can call it semi-
maintained at best.

So if you want to become the maintainer and test/send patches at an
earlier stage, please go right ahead!

/Magnus

On 7 apr 2009, at 03.52, ljb <ljb1813(at)pobox(dot)com> wrote:

> There were some recent changes to libpq/bcc32.mak that broke my
> attempt to
> build libpq with the Borland compiler. (OK, not so recent. I've been
> busy.)
> Five new modules were added from ports/: dirent dirmod pgsleep open
> win32error
> I had to removed two, dirent.c and open.c to get the compilation to
> work.
>
> CVS comment on the changes (Rev 1.30, 1.28.2.1) is:
> "Synchronize Borland libpq makefile to match MSVC. Backpatch to
> 8.3.X."
>
> So: Are changes to libpq/bcc32.mak being tested, or just applied
> assuming they
> are correct? Because if they are tested, I'm getting different
> results and we
> need to compare notes. If the changes are not tested, I will submit
> a patch
> that works for me.
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general