From: | Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> |
---|---|
To: | "Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev(at)SECTORBASE(dot)COM> |
Cc: | "'Tom Lane'" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: TOAST-table vacuuming (was Re: Idea for reducing planning time) |
Date: | 2000-12-18 00:41:39 |
Message-ID: | 3A3D5D43.5A9E1B49@tpf.co.jp |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Mikheev, Vadim" wrote:
>
> > > Also, is TOAST-table vacuuming fixed now?
> >
> > Still broken. Hiroshi had muttered something about fixing
> > the internal commit of VACUUM so that it's more like a real
> > commit --- including advancing the transaction ID --- but
> > still doesn't release the exclusive lock held by VACUUM.
> > Basically we need to propagate the locks forward to the new
> > xact instead of releasing them. I think that would be a nice
> > clean solution if we could do it. Do you have any ideas about how?
>
> Yes, it would be nice for cursors too - they should be able to cross
> transaction boundaries...
>
Cursors outside transactions is a nice feature I've
long wanted.
It would be nice if one of the requirement is solved.
How many factors should be solved to achieve it ?
For example,not release the buffers kept by such
cursors ...
Regards.
Hiroshi Inoue
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2000-12-18 01:05:40 | Re: Tuple data |
Previous Message | Hiroshi Inoue | 2000-12-18 00:10:21 | Re: Tuple data |