From: | mlw <markw(at)mohawksoft(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Andrew Snow <als(at)fl(dot)net(dot)au> |
Cc: | Hackers List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: OK, does anyone have any better ideas? |
Date: | 2000-12-09 02:07:22 |
Message-ID: | 3A3193DA.11E7C960@mohawksoft.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-novice |
Andrew Snow wrote:
>
> Could you perhaps post the code you have for splitting a text field up into
> keys, then I could work on turning into a new type of index with a new
> operator, as Tom suggested?
>
> (Or is this already what the text search code in contrib already does??)
Go to a search engine like lycos, alltheweb, or altavista. This is the
type of search capability I want to use in Postgres. I have it working
as a stand-alone daemon, it is fast and produces very relevant results.
I just thought that this sort of functionality would be a big plus if I
could tie it down deep in Postgres.
The big advantage to the code is high relevance, boolean operations, and
very very high speed operation. If I could get easy Postgres record
selection out of it, it would rock.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2000-12-09 02:28:38 | Re: Re: CRC |
Previous Message | Andrew Snow | 2000-12-09 01:58:41 | Re: OK, does anyone have any better ideas? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | mlw | 2000-12-09 02:40:14 | Re: OK, does anyone have any better ideas? |
Previous Message | Andrew Snow | 2000-12-09 01:58:41 | Re: OK, does anyone have any better ideas? |