Re: OK, does anyone have any better ideas?

From: mlw <markw(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>
To: Andrew Snow <als(at)fl(dot)net(dot)au>
Cc: Hackers List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: OK, does anyone have any better ideas?
Date: 2000-12-09 02:07:22
Message-ID: 3A3193DA.11E7C960@mohawksoft.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-novice

Andrew Snow wrote:
>
> Could you perhaps post the code you have for splitting a text field up into
> keys, then I could work on turning into a new type of index with a new
> operator, as Tom suggested?
>
> (Or is this already what the text search code in contrib already does??)

Go to a search engine like lycos, alltheweb, or altavista. This is the
type of search capability I want to use in Postgres. I have it working
as a stand-alone daemon, it is fast and produces very relevant results.
I just thought that this sort of functionality would be a big plus if I
could tie it down deep in Postgres.

The big advantage to the code is high relevance, boolean operations, and
very very high speed operation. If I could get easy Postgres record
selection out of it, it would rock.

--
http://www.mohawksoft.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2000-12-09 02:28:38 Re: Re: CRC
Previous Message Andrew Snow 2000-12-09 01:58:41 Re: OK, does anyone have any better ideas?

Browse pgsql-novice by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message mlw 2000-12-09 02:40:14 Re: OK, does anyone have any better ideas?
Previous Message Andrew Snow 2000-12-09 01:58:41 Re: OK, does anyone have any better ideas?