Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0

From: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)sun(dot)com>
Subject: Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0
Date: 2008-07-03 04:41:22
Message-ID: 3A2F4AB1-588D-4BBF-9CDB-DE5BC33FBB1F@kineticode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Jul 2, 2008, at 17:21, Tom Lane wrote:

>> Indeed, but why isn't this code put there as well?
>
> Well, actually, that might be the best thing to do with it. But it
> would be sensible to give it a code review anyway, no?

Obviously, I would argue that contrib is a good place for it, hence
the patch. I can say more on my reasoning if you'd like. But even if
it doesn't end up in contrib, I'm extremely grateful for the code
reviews.

Best,

David

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Yoshiyuki Asaba 2008-07-03 04:56:54 Re: Git Repository for WITH RECURSIVE and others
Previous Message David E. Wheeler 2008-07-03 04:40:12 Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0