Re: Transactions

From: Leandro Fanzone <leandro(at)hasar(dot)com>
To:
Cc: pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Transactions
Date: 2000-12-05 14:48:12
Message-ID: 3A2D002C.216E9491@hasar.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-novice

Yes, I heard something similar, but it's the same problem, I think the
transaction log never reaches the disk. I tried -B1 but complains (it must
be 16 at least). Thank you for your help, anyway. Any other ideas?

Leandro Fanzone.

Nabil Sayegh wrote:

> Leandro Fanzone wrote:
>
> > I'm having problems with transactions, lately. I'm checking
> > power-failure conditions on my psql-based programs, and found that a
> > simple loop with
>
> I found this article at dejanews:
>
> "[...] I see about a 50x to 100x performace increase with the inserts.
> This is because the default PostgreSQL setting is to write any commit
> through the disk cache directly onto disk. If you don't use 'begin'
> and 'commit' then every operation is a transaction and therefore written
> to disk immediately. [...]"
>
> cu
> --
> Nabil Sayegh

In response to

Browse pgsql-novice by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2000-12-05 15:21:04 Re: Transactions
Previous Message Nabil Sayegh 2000-12-05 14:40:26 Re: Transactions