Re: I can be a BUG?

From: Roberto Mello <rmello(at)cc(dot)usu(dot)edu>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Edipo E(dot) F(dot) Melo" <edipoelder(at)ig(dot)com(dot)br>, pgsql-sql <pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "sara(at)conectiva(dot)com(dot)br" <sara(at)conectiva(dot)com(dot)br>, "sarafabiana(at)starmedia(dot)com" <sarafabiana(at)starmedia(dot)com>
Subject: Re: I can be a BUG?
Date: 2000-12-01 23:25:36
Message-ID: 3A283370.B6F8BD19@cc.usu.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql

Tom Lane wrote:
>
> It kinda sounds like your wife created those tables in template1.
>
> Duplicating template1's contents into new databases isn't a bug,
> it's a feature ;-)

I've seen this behaviour too. Yesterday I pg_dumpall my 7.01 db
compiled from scratch and loaded in PG 7.02 installed from Debian
packages (I know a pg_dumpall wasn't needed, but I did it anyway).
When I went into psql, I was some of my databases with all the pg_*
tables. Why? Also, if I dropdb the database and createdb it again, it's
as if I never deleted it. Is that normal/bug/feature? Why?

-Roberto

P.S: It's nice to see some Brazilians on the list :) I am from Brazil
too. I hope Conectiva is promoting PostgreSQL down there.
--
Computer Science Utah State University
Space Dynamics Laboratory Web Developer
USU Free Software & GNU/Linux Club http://fslc.usu.edu
My home page - http://www.brasileiro.net/roberto

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Edipo E. F. Melo 2000-12-01 23:48:44 I can be a BUG?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-12-01 23:00:42 Re: I can be a BUG?