Re: Unanswered questions about Postgre

From: Joe Kislo <postgre(at)athenium(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Joel Burton <jburton(at)scw(dot)org>, igorr(at)ifi(dot)uio(dot)no, kislo(at)athenium(dot)com, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Unanswered questions about Postgre
Date: 2000-11-30 17:33:21
Message-ID: 3A268F61.B96784B5@athenium.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

> If that seems too small, maybe you need to rethink your database design
> ;-)
>
> There's also a 1G limit on the size of an individual BLOB that can be
> part of a row.

Hmm, 1G is probably fine :) But is there going to be a blob type with
toast? If I want to store a large binary object, and have the ability
of retrieving it strictly over the postgre database connection, would I
be retrieving a blob column, or a really long varchar column?

Thanks,

-Joe

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message The Hermit Hacker 2000-11-30 17:36:17 Re: Can PostGreSQL handle 100 user database - more info
Previous Message Vivek Khera 2000-11-30 17:33:11 Re: Can PostGreSQL handle 100 user database?