From: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Hackers List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Re: FWD: tinterval vs interval on pgsql-novice |
Date: | 2000-11-28 08:06:49 |
Message-ID: | 3A236799.D79B57D2@alumni.caltech.edu |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-novice |
> (the second one fails). Now that I look, this breakage was introduced in
> March when "we" expunged operators allowed as identifiers (Tom Lane and
> I have blood on our hands on this one ;) See gram.y around line 5409.
> Suggestions?
Any problems with allowing OVERLAPS and BETWEEN as function names? bison
seems happy with no shift/reduce conflicts...
- Thomas
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | john huttley | 2000-11-28 08:09:38 | Re: Full text Indexing -out of contrib and into main.. |
Previous Message | john huttley | 2000-11-28 07:53:42 | Re: Full text Indexing -out of contrib and into main.. |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2000-11-28 14:49:37 | Re: FWD: tinterval vs interval on pgsql-novice |
Previous Message | Rynell Wesson | 2000-11-28 00:26:15 | Re: Can not find -lpq |