Re: OK, that's one LOCALE bug report too many...

From: Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Don Baccus <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: OK, that's one LOCALE bug report too many...
Date: 2000-11-25 04:07:58
Message-ID: 3A1F3B1E.B20B9BD9@wgcr.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org> writes:
> I think your complaints about RedHat's default are right back in your
> lap ;-). Do you want to ignore their default, or not?

Yes, I want to ignore their default. This problem is more than just
cosmetic, thanks to the bugs that sparked this thread.

I can do things in the initscript if necessary. That only helps the
RPM's, though, not those from-source RedHat installations.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2000-11-25 04:15:23 Re: location of Unix socket
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-11-25 03:44:03 Re: OK, that's one LOCALE bug report too many...