From: | Roberto Mello <rmello(at)cc(dot)usu(dot)edu> |
---|---|
To: | Itai Zukerman <zukerman(at)math-hat(dot)com> |
Cc: | Colleen Williams <colleen(at)digital-arts(dot)co(dot)uk>, pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Persistent Connects (pg_pconnect) |
Date: | 2000-11-22 15:46:30 |
Message-ID: | 3A1BEA56.E41C7704@cc.usu.edu |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-sql |
Itai Zukerman wrote:
>
> Not sure if this is related, but under the non-threading Apache
> server, you get 1 persistent connection per Apache process. I don't
> think you can be sure which process gets the page with the connection
> request, so if you have a limit of, say, 50 processes, and your server
> is hit fairly often, eventually you'll see 50 connections even though
> only a few simultaneous accesses to PHP/PostgreSQL are made.
One way to work this out is to use a webserver that is fully
multithreaded, with pooled connections to the database that can be
shared among threads as needed. This yields much superior performance
and saves a ton of resources.
One example of such type of webserver that has been fully multithreaded
and under heavy use since 1995, and has a PHP4 module is AOLserver, that
powers mighty aol.com and digitalcity.com (with mere 32 K hits per
second).
AOLserver also has a built-in database abstraction layer and Tcl
interpreter (with the option of caching compiled code of scripts), and a
comprehensive API for building massively scalable dynamic websites.
More info at http://www.aolserver.com
-Roberto
--
Computer Science Utah State University
Space Dynamics Laboratory Web Developer
USU Free Software & GNU/Linux Club http://fslc.usu.edu
My home page - http://www.brasileiro.net/roberto
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stephan Szabo | 2000-11-22 19:16:35 | Re: Bug or feature |
Previous Message | Serge Canizares | 2000-11-22 14:08:47 | Re: Persistent Connects (pg_pconnect) |