| From: | Kevin Lo <kevin(dot)lo(at)toptk(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>, Robert Smith <rsmith(at)crepsunited(dot)com>, pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: ODBC Maintainer? |
| Date: | 2000-11-17 08:03:19 |
| Message-ID: | 3A14E647.6070901@toptk.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-interfaces |
The Hermit Hacker wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Nov 2000, Kevin Lo wrote:
>
>> Thomas Lockhart wrote:
>>
>>>> Hey, who is the current active maintainer of the ODBC driver?
>>>
>>>
>>> Unfortunately, there is no "current active maintainer". However, there
>>> are several people who have offered to help at a level just under what
>>> they felt would be required to be considered the project leader.
>>>
>>> Volunteers are accepted ;)
>>
>> I'll be a volunteer to implement odbc driver. Just wondering why don't
>> import unixODBC
>> code into Postgres src?
>
>
> If I recall correctly, it is under GPL, no? Which conflicts with our BSD
> liccense ... of course, I've been known to recall incorrectly at times :)
Well, it's under GPL. You recalled incorrectly :-)
- Kevin
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Anders Bengtsson | 2000-11-17 09:34:48 | Re: [INTERFACES] Re: no meaningful way to determine fe or be version? |
| Previous Message | Max Khon | 2000-11-17 07:35:53 | Re: ODBC Maintainer? |