From: | Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee> |
---|---|
To: | Hans Schou <chlor(at)schou(dot)dk> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Danish database patent |
Date: | 2000-11-11 16:35:26 |
Message-ID: | 3A0D754E.483CC6A4@tm.ee |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hans Schou wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> I hope this is the right list to write to.
>
> A danish company just got a patent which we at SSLUG www.sslug.dk do not
> think is a new invention.
>
> I want to get in contact with somebody who can confirm that this patent is
> not new and has been in PostgreSQL before the patent was taken.
>
> If we can prove that this patent was not new when requested, we plan to
> start a trial against the company or Patent Office to get the patent
> redrawn.
>
> It is a bit troublesome to get all the documents.
> You can find a tar-ball here:
> http://www.sslug.dk/~chlor/targit.tgz
> There is four pages which is interesting:
> http://www.sslug.dk/~chlor/targit/bns01.pdf
> http://www.sslug.dk/~chlor/targit/bns31.pdf
> http://www.sslug.dk/~chlor/targit/bns32.pdf
> http://www.sslug.dk/~chlor/targit/bns33.pdf
>
I took only a brief look at them, so i may be in a state of
misunderstanding :)
As I understand it, the patent is about generating/composing queries
_before_
submitting them to backend, not about query processing in the backend.
So there is not much hope that postgres has done it before, as 99% of
postgres
is concerned with backend activities.
-----------
Hannu
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Don Baccus | 2000-11-11 16:52:02 | Re: Danish database patent |
Previous Message | Hans Schou | 2000-11-11 16:23:40 | Danish database patent |