From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | sqllist <pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Outer Joins |
Date: | 2000-11-02 16:55:36 |
Message-ID: | 3A019C88.942D17B8@agliodbs.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-sql |
Marc, Tom,
> Good point. Frankly, if you have a relevant large population of data
> (>10,000 rows) to test, I'd love to see comparative execution tests
> between the two query structures.
>
> Fortunately, this will all soon become moot; Tom says that outer joins
> have been stable in the 7.1 build for a while. Speaking of which,
> when's the 7.1 "release"? Huh, huh?
On second thought, couldn't we use some kind of EXCLUDES clause to
expedite this? Tom?
Further, it occurs to me that as in my query, you don't want to use "NOT
IN" on *either* version. Instead, use "NOT EXISTS", which is much, much
faster.
-Josh Berkus
--
______AGLIO DATABASE SOLUTIONS___________________________
Josh Berkus
Complete information technology josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com
and data management solutions (415) 436-9166
for law firms, small businesses fax 436-0137
and non-profit organizations. pager 338-4078
San Francisco
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2000-11-02 17:17:05 | Re: Re(2): Re(2): Large Object dump ? |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2000-11-02 16:37:32 | Re: Outer Joins |