From: | Grant Finnemore <gaf(at)ucs(dot)co(dot)za> |
---|---|
To: | Marc Rohloff <Marc(dot)Rohloff(at)eskom(dot)co(dot)za> |
Cc: | pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Outer Joins |
Date: | 2000-11-01 11:56:27 |
Message-ID: | 3A0004EA.3E7724F6@ucs.co.za |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-sql |
Marc,
I did not look at your queries, but outer joins are supported in the latest development version of PostgreSQL, and will be supported in the upcoming 7.1 release of the software - beta due soon.
Regards,
Grant
Marc Rohloff wrote:
> I've been looking at the open-source databases for a project I am working on and while reading about Postgres I saw that they do not support outer joins yet. I was intrigued by their solution of using a union query.
>
> Something Like:
> select a.col1, b.col2 from a,b where a.col1 = b.col2
> union
> select a.col1, NULL from a where a.col1 not in (select b.col2 from b)
>
> But I was wondering if the following would work (it does in some other databases)
>
> select a.col1, b.col2 from a,b
> where a.col1 = b.col2
> or b.col2 is null
>
> or maybe even
>
> select a.col1, b.col2 from a,b
> where a.col1 = b.col2
> or a.col1 not in (select b.col2 from b)
>
> These would seem to be far more efficient than a union query
> (I would try this but I don't have a Unix box at the moment to install PostgreSQL on!)
>
> Marc Rohloff
--
> Poorly planned software requires a genius to write it
> and a hero to use it.
Grant Finnemore BSc(Eng) (mailto:gaf(at)ucs(dot)co(dot)za)
Software Engineer Universal Computer Services
Tel (+27)(11)712-1366 PO Box 31266 Braamfontein 2017, South Africa
Cell (+27)(82)604-5536 20th Floor, 209 Smit St., Braamfontein
Fax (+27)(11)339-3421 Johannesburg, South Africa
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | pgsql-sql | 2000-11-01 13:44:50 | Re(2): Re(2): Large Object dump ? |
Previous Message | Karel Zak | 2000-11-01 10:18:19 | Re: Re(2): Large Object dump ? |